
Ok, so the logical thing to do would be to pull up to a gate so the passengers could get off and decide what they want to do from there. However, the airline didn’t want people stranded in Austin for two or three days.
But the question still remains...why didn’t they just let the passengers wait in the lobby? Is it because it would be too much trouble to de-board the whole plane and then let them back on? Does it cost money to do that? Did the airline know that there were heavy rainstorms but didn’t want to lose money from that flight?
Well, now passengers are asking Congress for a bill of rights for airline passengers including a law that an airplane has to go to a gate if it has to sit on the runway for more than three hours. Do you think this law will pass?
Discuss this over at Loren Steffy’s blog or leave a comment here!








If the pilot hadn't taken it upon himself to pull up to an empty gate, the plane might still be sitting there.
News coverage here stated that American Airlines kept bumping this flight down the list because it was trying to keep others on time. So yes, it does come down to money.
Regards,
Glenn
Posted by: Glenn (Customer Service Experience) Ross | January 28, 2007 3:32 PM | Permalink to Comment